Same-sex marriage opponents on Wednesday blasted the U.S. Supreme Court after it struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act and California‚Äôs Proposition 8.
Concerned Women for America President Penny Nance described the two rulings as ‚Äúthe Roe v. Wade of marriage,‚ÄĚ referring to the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion in the country.
‚ÄúWhile the justices sit in their high chairs, these decisions will have very real-life consequences for American families, especially as it relates to our religious liberties,‚ÄĚ she said. ‚ÄúThose who hold a Biblical view of marriage can expect much persecution from the government in the years to come.‚ÄĚ
Fox News Radio host Todd Starnes tweeted ‚ÄúSupreme Court overrules God‚ÄĚ after the justices announced their decisions. He added it ‚Äúwon‚Äôt be long before they (the justices) outlaw the Bible as hate speech.
Bishop Harry Jackson of Hope Christian Church of Beltsville, Md., also took to social media to criticize the DOMA decision.
‚ÄúLaws cannot be enforced; justice is always the loser,‚ÄĚ he tweeted. ‚ÄúCriminals crowd out honest people and twist the laws around.‚ÄĚ
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops categorized the rulings as “a tragic day for marriage and our nation.
“The Supreme Court has dealt a profound injustice to the American people by striking down in part the federal Defense of Marriage Act,” the group, of which New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan is the president, said.
The group is among those who joined National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown; Ruth Institute President Jennifer Roback Morse; American Values President Gary Bauer; New York State Sen. Ruben Diaz, Sr.; and Tami Fitzgerald, executive director of the North Carolina Values Coalition and others at an anti-gay marriage rally on the National Mall in March after the justices heard oral arguments in the Prop 8 case.
‚ÄúBy striking down the federal definition of marriage in DOMA, the court is asserting that Congress does not have the power to define the meaning of words in statutes Congress itself has enacted,‚ÄĚ Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said. ‚ÄúThis is absurd.‚ÄĚ
Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, who unsuccessfully sought to place a proposed constitutional amendment on her state‚Äôs 2004 ballot that would have defined marriage as between a man and a woman, is among the members of Congress who criticized the Supreme Court‚Äôs rulings.
‚ÄúMarriage was created by the hand of God,‚ÄĚ she said. ‚ÄúNo man, not even a Supreme Court, can undo what a holy God has instituted.‚ÄĚ
‚ÄúIt‚Äôs pretty hard to believe that the Supreme Court would say that the 85 Senators, 342 members of the House of Representatives, and Democrat President Bill Clinton ‚Äď all who supported DOMA when it was signed into law nearly 20 years ago ‚Äď voted for DOMA literally seeking to injure and impose stigma on gay individuals,‚ÄĚ U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) added. ‚ÄúThat may be the perception of five Justices, but it is simply not true. I‚Äôve always felt that marriage was an issue best left up to each state, and that‚Äôs essentially what the Court ruled today. But this ruling is a disappointment because instead of allowing the American people and their elected representatives to continue the debate about same-sex marriage, the Court instead used its own personal opinion to tip the balance.‚ÄĚ
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who on Tuesday petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court‚Äôs ruling earlier this year that struck down the commonwealth‚Äôs anti-sodomy law, said in a statement the state ‚Äúhas followed the traditional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman for more than 400 years.‚ÄĚ He also noted Virginians in 2006 approved a constitutional amendment that banned nuptials for gays and lesbians.
Cuccinelli, who is also running for governor against former Democratic National Committee Chair Terry McAuliffe, who supports same-sex marriage, added he feels the Prop 8 and DOMA decisions will have no impact in Virginia.
‚ÄúThe court‚Äôs two decisions on marriage make clear that the rulings have no effect on the Virginia Marriage Amendment or to any other Virginia law related to marriage,‚ÄĚ Cuccinelli said.